Staudner v. Robinson Aviation, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Staudner v. Robinson Aviation, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 267 F. Supp. 3d 679
District Court, E.D. North Carolina·Decided March 3, 2020·No. 4:15-cv-00098·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA □ EASTERN DIVISION □ TS No. 4:15-CV-98-BO

PATRICK P. STAUDNER, )

Plaintiff, ) ) ) ORDER . ) ROBINSON AVIATION, INC., ) PROFESSIONAL AIR TRAFFIC ) . CONTROLLERS ORGANIZATION, ) ‘Defendants. )

Several motions in limine filed prior to the trial remain pending on the Court’s docket. [DE 130, 1 38, 146, 15 ij. The clerk is DIRECTED to terminate these motions as pending as the trial in

this matter has concluded and any evidentiary objections made therein were either raised and ruled ‘on at the trial or waived. See, e.g., Finch v. Covil Corp., 388 F. Supp. 3d 593, 612 (M.DN.C. 2019) (courts routinely defer deciding motions in limine and consider objections raised during the □ trial); Fed. R. Evid. 103(6).

$O.ORDERED, this—3__day of March 2020.

Bert ieee Lert! j “io ciliged uscd ented te TERRENCE W. BOYLE re. as CHIEF UNITED STATES DISPRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Staudner v. Robinson Aviation, Inc., (E.D.N.C. 2020).

Staudner v. Robinson Aviation, Inc. (Staudner v. Robinson Aviation, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Finch v. Covil Corp.
388 F. Supp. 3d 593 (M.D. North Carolina, 2019)