Statt v. Goldstein

191 A.D.2d 963, 595 N.Y.S.2d 701
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 12, 1993·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

—Appeal and cross appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: In this action alleging social worker malpractice and negligence, defendant demanded disclosure of, inter alia, the records and notes of plaintiffs treating psychiatrist. Claiming privilege, plaintiff moved for a protective order, and defendant cross-moved to compel disclosure. Supreme Court deferred determination of the motion and cross motion pending an in camera review of the psychiatrist’s records and notes. Defendant appeals and plaintiff cross-appeals. Both appeals are premature. Neither motion has been decided and, therefore, no substantial right of either party has as yet been affected (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]; Buhler v Sheridan, 134 AD2d 822). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Calvaruso, J. — Discovery.) Present— Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Statt v. Goldstein, 191 A.D.2d 963, 595 N.Y.S.2d 701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

191 A.D.2d 963 (Statt v. Goldstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buhler v. Sheridan
134 A.D.2d 822 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)