Statt v. American Home Assurance Co.

191 A.D.2d 962, 595 N.Y.S.2d 700
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 12, 1993·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as [963]*963modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: This declaratory judgment action is premature. The extent of defendant American Home Assurance Company’s (Home) duty to indemnify must necessarily depend on the resolution of an issue that, if it arises, will be decided in the underlying action (see, Hout v Coffman, 126 AD2d 973; Allstate Ins. Co. v Santiago, 98 AD2d 608). Thus, the complaint against Home must be dismissed.

Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Home’s application for an award of costs, disbursements and attorney’s fees. (Appeals from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Calvaruso, J. — Declaratory Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Statt v. American Home Assurance Co., 191 A.D.2d 962, 595 N.Y.S.2d 700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

191 A.D.2d 962 (Statt v. American Home Assurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rojas v. Romanoff
2020 NY Slip Op 4237 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
American Home Assurance Co. v. McDonald
182 Misc. 2d 716 (New York Supreme Court, 1999)