Staton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Staton v. State

256 So. 2d 70

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 7, 1971

DocketNo. 71-856

StatusPublished

This text of 256 So. 2d 70 (Staton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Staton v. State, 256 So. 2d 70 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent-defendant and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude the appeal is wholly frivolous, Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24; Stewart v. State, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 155; Thomas v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 223 So.2d 118; Tafero v. State, Fla. App.1969, 223 So.2d 564. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted and the order or judgment is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent-defendant and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude the appeal is wholly frivolous, Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24; Stewart v. State, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 155; Thomas v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 223 So.2d 118; Tafero v. State, Fla. App.1969, 223 So.2d 564. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted and the order or judgment is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 So. 2d 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staton-v-state-fladistctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack