Staton v. District of Columbia
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) FLORITA STATON, as parent/guardian ) of the minor child, D.S., et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-0773 (ABJ) ) THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________)
ORDER
On June 11, 2014, Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson issued a Report and
Recommendation [Dkt. # 18] with respect to plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment [Dkt.
# 11] and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 13]. The report advised the
parties that any objections to the report must be filed “[w]ithin fourteen days” of the report, and
that “in the absence of timely objections, further review of issues addressed [in the report] may
be deemed waived.” June 11, 2014 Report & Recommendation at 15. To date, no objections
have been filed.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. # 18] is
ADOPTED in its entirety;
it is FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion summary judgment [Dkt. # 11] is
granted in part and denied in part;
it is FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment [Dkt.
# 13] is denied; and
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Staton v. District of Columbia (Staton v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.