Statkawicz v. Laguna

143 N.W. 677, 155 Wis. 304, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 4
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 13, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 143 N.W. 677 (Statkawicz v. Laguna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Statkawicz v. Laguna, 143 N.W. 677, 155 Wis. 304, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 4 (Wis. 1914).

Opinions

[305]*305The following opinion was filed October 28, 1913:

MaRshaui,, J.

It is not contended but wliat tlie pleadings and findings support, the judgment. Without a bill of exceptions properly settle^, we are unable to officially know whether the findings are unwarranted by the evidence or whether there was newly discovered evidence, which, in view of the other evidence, entitled appellant to á retrial. Therefore, the judgment must be affirmed.

By ihe Gourt. — So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Will of Britt
182 N.W. 738 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1921)
Behnke v. Kroening
182 N.W. 837 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1921)
Tingley v. Richter
177 N.W. 901 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 N.W. 677, 155 Wis. 304, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/statkawicz-v-laguna-wis-1914.