Statkawicz v. Laguna

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Statkawicz v. Laguna

143 N.W. 677, 155 Wis. 304, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 4

Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided January 13, 1914·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

[305] The following opinion was filed October 28, 1913:

MaRshaui,, J.

It is not contended but wliat tlie pleadings and findings support, the judgment. Without a bill of exceptions properly settle^, we are unable to officially know whether the findings are unwarranted by the evidence or whether there was newly discovered evidence, which, in view of the other evidence, entitled appellant to á retrial. Therefore, the judgment must be affirmed.

By ihe Gourt. — So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[305] The following opinion was filed October 28, 1913:

MaRshaui,, J.

It is not contended but wliat tlie pleadings and findings support, the judgment. Without a bill of exceptions properly settle^, we are unable to officially know whether the findings are unwarranted by the evidence or whether there was newly discovered evidence, which, in view of the other evidence, entitled appellant to á retrial. Therefore, the judgment must be affirmed.

By ihe Gourt. — So ordered.

Statkawicz v. Laguna, 143 N.W. 677, 155 Wis. 304, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 4 (Wis. 1914).

Pincite

143 N.W. 677 (Statkawicz v. Laguna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related