Statkawicz v. Laguna
This text of 143 N.W. 677 (Statkawicz v. Laguna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
[305]*305The following opinion was filed October 28, 1913:
It is not contended but wliat tlie pleadings and findings support, the judgment. Without a bill of exceptions properly settle^, we are unable to officially know whether the findings are unwarranted by the evidence or whether there was newly discovered evidence, which, in view of the other evidence, entitled appellant to á retrial. Therefore, the judgment must be affirmed.
By ihe Gourt. — So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
143 N.W. 677, 155 Wis. 304, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/statkawicz-v-laguna-wis-1914.