Stathers v. Renz

96 A. 717, 251 Pa. 315, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 466
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 3, 1916
DocketAppeal, No. 40
StatusPublished

This text of 96 A. 717 (Stathers v. Renz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stathers v. Renz, 96 A. 717, 251 Pa. 315, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 466 (Pa. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We agree with the learned court below that Virginia Tustin had an estate in fee in the land in dispute which became vested in the defendants in this case, and the judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned trial judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 A. 717, 251 Pa. 315, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stathers-v-renz-pa-1916.