Statham v. State
135 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 687
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Statham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 Ala. App. 135 →
Opinion
The evidence for the state was sufficient to authorize a verdict of guilt as charged in the indictment, and hence the affirmative charge was properly refused.
Refused charges 2 and 4 assert a correct proposition of law, but were fully covered by the court in his oral charge.
There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Statham v. State, 135 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 687 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).
135 So. 926 (Statham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.