Statham v. State
135 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 687
This text of 135 So. 926 (Statham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Statham v. State, 135 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 687 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
The evidence for the state was sufficient to authorize a verdict of guilt as charged in the indictment, and hence the affirmative charge was properly refused.
Refused charges 2 and 4 assert a correct proposition of law, but were fully covered by the court in his oral charge.
There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/statham-v-state-alactapp-1931.