Statewide Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Canoe Hill, Inc.
This text of 378 N.E.2d 118 (Statewide Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Canoe Hill, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
In this case, where the parties are the original mortgagor and mortgagee, any intention to include the personalty within the embrace of the mortgage by its omnibus reference to "all the fixtures and articles of personal property, now or hereafter attached to or used in connection with the premises” is negated by the simultaneous execution of the separate security agreement covering "Furniture * * * and all equipment * * * owned by the debtor for use in connection with the maintenance and upkeep of the golf club and golf course” (cf. General Synod of Reformed Church v Bonac Realty Corp., 297 NY 119; East Riv. Sav. Bank v 671 Prospect Ave. Holding Corp., 280 NY 342). Consistently, the complaint did not allege that the mortgage covered the personal property, the referee’s notice of sale on foreclosure did not enumerate it, the auctioneer did not offer it and the referee’s report was completely silent on the subject.
Accordingly, the order should be affirmed, with costs.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
378 N.E.2d 118, 44 N.Y.2d 843, 44 N.Y. 843, 406 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/statewide-savings-loan-assn-v-canoe-hill-inc-ny-1978.