Statesman National Life Insurance Company v. Nash, Jo Anne H.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Statesman National Life Insurance Company v. Nash, Jo Anne H.

DecidedApril 13, 2000

Docket13-99-00161-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Statesman National Life Insurance Company v. Nash, Jo Anne H. (Statesman National Life Insurance Company v. Nash, Jo Anne H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Statesman National Life Insurance Company v. Nash, Jo Anne H., (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-99-161-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

STATESMAN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,

v.

JO ANNE H. NASH, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 92nd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Chavez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, STATESMAN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-0071-98-A. The clerk's record was filed on May 4, 1999. The reporter's record was filed on February 3, 2000. Appellant's brief was due on March 6, 2000. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On March 17, 2000, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed

this the 13^th day of April, 2000

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-99-161-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

STATESMAN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,

v.

JO ANNE H. NASH, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 92nd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Chavez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, STATESMAN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-0071-98-A. The clerk's record was filed on May 4, 1999. The reporter's record was filed on February 3, 2000. Appellant's brief was due on March 6, 2000. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On March 17, 2000, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed

this the 13^th day of April, 2000

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Statesman National Life Insurance Company v. Nash, Jo Anne H., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/statesman-national-life-insurance-company-v-nash-j-texapp-2000.