Statesman Garden, LP v. Sereta Blackman

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-12076

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

STATESMAN GARDEN, LP, a.k.a. The Statesman, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SERETA BLACKMAN, and All Other Occupants,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-12076

D.C. Docket No. 2:24-cv-00124-RWS

____________________

Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction . Sereta Blackman, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s order remanding to state court a dispossessory action. We lack jurisdiction to review the remand order because it was based on the district court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)-(d); New v. Sports & Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (11th Cir. 1997); Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness, Inc. v. Humana Med Plan, Inc., 254 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001).

No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.