States v. Morris

E.D. Pennsylvania

States v. Morris

27 F. 341

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided July 1, 1886·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Butler, J.

Under the facts stated in the special verdict the defendant is entitled to judgment. The testator having abandoned his residence in this country, and removed to Europe,—where he died,— the legacies provided for by his will are not affected by the act of congress of June 30, 1864. The case cannot be distinguished from U. S. v. Hannewell, 13 Fed. Rep. 617.

The clerk is therefore directed to enter judgment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler, J.

Under the facts stated in the special verdict the defendant is entitled to judgment. The testator having abandoned his residence in this country, and removed to Europe,—where he died,— the legacies provided for by his will are not affected by the act of congress of June 30, 1864. The case cannot be distinguished from U. S. v. Hannewell, 13 Fed. Rep. 617.

The clerk is therefore directed to enter judgment for the defendant.

States v. Morris, 27 F. 341 (E.D. Pa. 1886).

Pincite

27 F. 341 (States v. Morris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related