States v. Martinez

44 Cust. Ct. 626
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 7, 1960
DocketReap. Dec. 9652; Entry No. 6370
StatusPublished

This text of 44 Cust. Ct. 626 (States v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
States v. Martinez, 44 Cust. Ct. 626 (cusc 1960).

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

The proper dutiable value of certain concrete reinforcing bars exported from Belgium is the subject of this collector’s appeal for a reappraisement.

The record before the court discloses that the parties hereto are in agreement that export value is the proper basis of appraisement of the subject merchandise in issue, there being no higher foreign value, and that said value is represented by the following—

14" bars — $4.32 per 100 pounds
%" bars — $3.95 per 100 pounds
y2" bars — $3.86 per 100 pounds less total transport charges to
Antwerp $148.41, and “putting on board expenses” $17.72, packed.

Upon the agreed facts of record, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(d)), is the proper basis for determining the value of the concrete reinforcing bars in controversy and that said value is as tabulated above.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1402
19 U.S.C. § 1402(d)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 Cust. Ct. 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/states-v-martinez-cusc-1960.