States v. Baker

Eighth Circuit

States v. Baker

526 F.2d 804, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11394

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 18, 1975·No. No. 75-1552·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jim Baker appeals from his conviction for dealing in firearms without a license, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(1) and 924(a). He contends that government agents entrapped him and that the evidence was insufficient for conviction.

Baker was tried before the Honorable H. Kenneth Wangelin, whose findings of fact and conclusions of law are reported in United States v. Baker, 397 F.Supp. 1122 (E.D.Mo.1975). Finding no error in those proceedings, we affirm on the basis of Judge Wangelin’s memorandum opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jim Baker appeals from his conviction for dealing in firearms without a license, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(1) and 924(a). He contends that government agents entrapped him and that the evidence was insufficient for conviction.

Baker was tried before the Honorable H. Kenneth Wangelin, whose findings of fact and conclusions of law are reported in United States v. Baker, 397 F.Supp. 1122 (E.D.Mo.1975). Finding no error in those proceedings, we affirm on the basis of Judge Wangelin’s memorandum opinion.

States v. Baker, 526 F.2d 804, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11394 (8th Cir. 1975).

Pincite

526 F.2d 804 (States v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related