States v. Baker

Eighth Circuit

States v. Baker

526 F.2d 804, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11394

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 18, 1975

DocketNo. 75-1552

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 526 F.2d 804 (States v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

States v. Baker, 526 F.2d 804, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11394 (8th Cir. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jim Baker appeals from his conviction for dealing in firearms without a license, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(1) and 924(a). He contends that government agents entrapped him and that the evidence was insufficient for conviction.

Baker was tried before the Honorable H. Kenneth Wangelin, whose findings of fact and conclusions of law are reported in United States v. Baker, 397 F.Supp. 1122 (E.D.Mo.1975). Finding no error in those proceedings, we affirm on the basis of Judge Wangelin’s memorandum opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jim Baker appeals from his conviction for dealing in firearms without a license, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(1) and 924(a). He contends that government agents entrapped him and that the evidence was insufficient for conviction.

Baker was tried before the Honorable H. Kenneth Wangelin, whose findings of fact and conclusions of law are reported in United States v. Baker, 397 F.Supp. 1122 (E.D.Mo.1975). Finding no error in those proceedings, we affirm on the basis of Judge Wangelin’s memorandum opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

526 F.2d 804, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/states-v-baker-ca8-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack