States Steamship Co.

Court of Claims

States Steamship Co.

193 Ct. Cl. 1098, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 101, 1971 WL 4108

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedJanuary 15, 1971

DocketNo. 109-69

StatusPublished

This text of 193 Ct. Cl. 1098 (States Steamship Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

States Steamship Co., 193 Ct. Cl. 1098, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 101, 1971 WL 4108 (cc 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Contracts; operating-differential subsidy agreement; recapture computation; investment tax credit. — On July 15, 1970 (192 Ct. Cl. 795, 428 F. 2d 882) the court rendered a decision holding that plaintiff was entitled to recover and entering judgment to that effect, the determination of the amount of recovery being reserved pending further proceedings. This case now comes before the court on a stipulation of the parties filed January 5,1971, on behalf of plaintiff and defendant by the respective attorneys of record in which it is stated that the parties have stipulated a settlement pur[1099]*1099suant to which the difference between certain subsidy payments made on or about July 28,1968, and payments which would have been made had defendant through the Maritime Administration not reduced plaintiff’s taxes by the amount of its investment tax credit for the years 1963-1967 will be credited as stipulated; that certain erroneous reductions and adjustments in federal income taxes and final subsidy accountings will be made, as stipulated, and that on the basis of such stipulation plaintiff moves the court for an order dismissing the case with prejudice. On January 15,1971, the court ordered, based on the stipulation of the parties, that plaintiff’s motion be and it is granted and the petition is dismissed with prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Contracts; operating-differential subsidy agreement; recapture computation; investment tax credit. — On July 15, 1970 (192 Ct. Cl. 795, 428 F. 2d 882) the court rendered a decision holding that plaintiff was entitled to recover and entering judgment to that effect, the determination of the amount of recovery being reserved pending further proceedings. This case now comes before the court on a stipulation of the parties filed January 5,1971, on behalf of plaintiff and defendant by the respective attorneys of record in which it is stated that the parties have stipulated a settlement pur[1099]*1099suant to which the difference between certain subsidy payments made on or about July 28,1968, and payments which would have been made had defendant through the Maritime Administration not reduced plaintiff’s taxes by the amount of its investment tax credit for the years 1963-1967 will be credited as stipulated; that certain erroneous reductions and adjustments in federal income taxes and final subsidy accountings will be made, as stipulated, and that on the basis of such stipulation plaintiff moves the court for an order dismissing the case with prejudice. On January 15,1971, the court ordered, based on the stipulation of the parties, that plaintiff’s motion be and it is granted and the petition is dismissed with prejudice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 Ct. Cl. 1098, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 101, 1971 WL 4108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/states-steamship-co-cc-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack