Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Staten v. State

Staten v. State

595 So. 2d 1112, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3882, 1992 WL 64460
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 3, 1992
DocketNo. 90-02113
StatusPublished

This text of 595 So. 2d 1112 (Staten v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Staten v. State, 595 So. 2d 1112, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3882, 1992 WL 64460 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from convictions for robbery and possession of cocaine, appellant Darrell Staten raises two issues. Both are without merit. The search of Staten’s automobile, which produced the cocaine in question, was lawful since Staten had committed the offense of fleeing a police officer1 and was subject to arrest for same. Moreover, the court did not err in placing Staten on probation despite the fact he also was declared a habitual felony offender.

See King v. State, 597 So.2d 309 (Fla.2d DCA March 4, 1992).

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. State
597 So. 2d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
595 So. 2d 1112, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3882, 1992 WL 64460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staten-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.