Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Staten v. State

Staten v. State

585 So. 2d 1196, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9868, 1991 WL 191614
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 25, 1991
DocketNo. 90-02085
StatusPublished

This text of 585 So. 2d 1196 (Staten v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Staten v. State, 585 So. 2d 1196, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9868, 1991 WL 191614 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse those portions of the defendant’s sentences which classify the defendant as an habitual offender. From the record, it appears that the state failed to provide notice of its intention to seek habitual offender status. § 775.084(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (1989). On remand, the state may [1197]*1197again seek habitual offender status after it provides proper written notice. See Scott v. State, 446 So.2d 261 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Reversed and remanded.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. State
446 So. 2d 261 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
585 So. 2d 1196, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9868, 1991 WL 191614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staten-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.