Stately v. Red Lake Builders

794 N.W.2d 640, 2011 Minn. LEXIS 67, 2011 WL 810360
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided March 1, 2011·No. No. A10-1909·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 30, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/David R. Stras Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stately v. Red Lake Builders, 794 N.W.2d 640, 2011 Minn. LEXIS 67, 2011 WL 810360 (Mich. 2011).

794 N.W.2d 640 (Stately v. Red Lake Builders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)