Stately v. Red Lake Builders

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Stately v. Red Lake Builders

794 N.W.2d 640, 2011 Minn. LEXIS 67, 2011 WL 810360

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMarch 1, 2011

DocketNo. A10-1909

StatusPublished

This text of 794 N.W.2d 640 (Stately v. Red Lake Builders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stately v. Red Lake Builders, 794 N.W.2d 640, 2011 Minn. LEXIS 67, 2011 WL 810360 (Mich. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 30, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/David R. Stras Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI