State-Wide Insurance v. Rowe

250 A.D.2d 771, 672 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5814

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), entered August 4, 1997, which denied its application.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the petitioner’s application to stay arbitration as untimely (see, CPLR 7503 [c]; Matter of Steck [State Farm Ins. Co.], 89 NY2d 1082; Matter of Metropolitan Prop. & Liab. Ins. Co. v Hancock, 183 AD2d 831).

In light of our determination, it is unnecessary to address the petitioner’s remaining contentions (see, Matter of Metropolitan Prop. & Liab. Ins. Co. v Hancock, supra, at 832). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State-Wide Insurance v. Rowe, 250 A.D.2d 771, 672 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

250 A.D.2d 771 (State-Wide Insurance v. Rowe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the Arbitration Between Steck & State Farm Insurance
681 N.E.2d 1285 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance v. Hancock
183 A.D.2d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)