State-Wide Insurance v. Curry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

State-Wide Insurance v. Curry

55 A.D.2d 675, 390 N.Y.S.2d 12, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15435

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 A.D.2d 675 (State-Wide Insurance v. Curry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State-Wide Insurance v. Curry, 55 A.D.2d 675, 390 N.Y.S.2d 12, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15435 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to stay arbitration, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 10, 1976, which denied the application. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant, and application granted. The papers submitted in support of the motion were adequate for the purpose of providing Special Term with jurisdiction (cf. Matter of Empire Mut. Ins. Co. [Palladino], 54 AD2d 863). The application for a stay was improperly denied. Respondents were not struck by an uninsured motorist within the meaning of the New York automobile accident indemnification indorsement of the insurance policy. The security funds available pursuant to sections 333 and 334 of the Insurance Law provided coverage for the offending motorist. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur. [— Misc 2d —.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to stay arbitration, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 10, 1976, which denied the application. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant, and application granted. The papers submitted in support of the motion were adequate for the purpose of providing Special Term with jurisdiction (cf. Matter of Empire Mut. Ins. Co. [Palladino], 54 AD2d 863). The application for a stay was improperly denied. Respondents were not struck by an uninsured motorist within the meaning of the New York automobile accident indemnification indorsement of the insurance policy. The security funds available pursuant to sections 333 and 334 of the Insurance Law provided coverage for the offending motorist. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur. [— Misc 2d —.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 675, 390 N.Y.S.2d 12, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-wide-insurance-v-curry-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack