State Vs. Villa-Mederos (Cristobal)
This text of 475 P.3d 767 (State Vs. Villa-Mederos (Cristobal)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
THE STATE OF NEVADA, No. 81923 Appellant, vs. CRISTOBAL VILLA-MEDEROS, Respondent. FILE
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is the state's appeal from an order granting respondent's motion to suppress. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Connie J. Steinheimer, Judge. Because it appeared the notice of appeal required pursuant to NRS 177.105(2) was untimely filed, this court entered an order directing appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant has responded and moves to voluntarily dismiss this appeal. Appellant concedes that the notice of appeal was untimely, resulting in a jurisdictional defect, and further indicates that the State no longer wishes to pursue this appeal. The request for a voluntary dismissal is granted, and this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
J.
J. Stiglich Silver SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
0) 1447A 14-gigpti AS= cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheirner, District Judge Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe County Public Defender Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(01 1947A 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
475 P.3d 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-vs-villa-mederos-cristobal-nev-2020.