State v. Zurawski
219 A.2d 614, 47 N.J. 160, 1966 N.J. LEXIS 198
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Brown in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Hall and Schettino. — 6.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Zurawski, 219 A.2d 614, 47 N.J. 160, 1966 N.J. LEXIS 198 (N.J. 1966).
219 A.2d 614 (State v. Zurawski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Allen v. Passaic Cty.
530 A.2d 371 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
State v. Dolce
428 A.2d 947 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1981)
State v. Williams
417 A.2d 1046 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1980)
State v. Ransom
405 A.2d 411 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
State v. Williams
403 A.2d 31 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
United States ex rel. Hart v. Davenport
478 F.2d 203 (Third Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Davenport
478 F.2d 203 (Third Circuit, 1973)