State v. Zuniga-Zarmiento

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Zuniga-Zarmiento

144 P.3d 1024, 208 Or. App. 325, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1447

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 27, 2006

Docket040241876; A124629

StatusPublished

This text of 144 P.3d 1024 (State v. Zuniga-Zarmiento) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Zuniga-Zarmiento, 144 P.3d 1024, 208 Or. App. 325, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1447 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of tampering with physical evidence, ORS 162.295. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court should have granted his motion for a judgment of acquittal because the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the state, does not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant destroyed physical evidence with the intent to keep it from being used in an official proceeding. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient and that the trial court erred. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of tampering with physical evidence, ORS 162.295. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court should have granted his motion for a judgment of acquittal because the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the state, does not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant destroyed physical evidence with the intent to keep it from being used in an official proceeding. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient and that the trial court erred. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 P.3d 1024, 208 Or. App. 325, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-zuniga-zarmiento-orctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack