State v. Zink
This text of 2010 ND 230 (State v. Zink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 12/2/10 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2010 ND 223
Joe R. Blurton, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20100182
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven L. Marquart, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Joe R. Blurton (on brief), self-represented, James River Correctional Center, 2521 Circle Drive, Jamestown, N.D. 58401, petitioner and appellant.
Reid Alan Brady (on brief) and Cherie LaVonne Clark (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorneys, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee.
Blurton v. State
[¶1] Joe Blurton appeals from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief following a conviction for gross sexual imposition. See State v. Blurton , 2009 ND 144, 770 N.W.2d 231. On appeal, he alleges: (1) prosecutorial misconduct; (2) ineffective assistance of counsel; (3) legal and factual innocence; (4) procedural errors and denial of due process; and (5) failure of the prosecution to disclose material exculpatory evidence. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (6).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2010 ND 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-zink-nd-2010.