State v. Zerbst
This text of 359 Mont. 72 (State v. Zerbst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On February 9, 2010, the defendant was sentenced for violations of the conditions of a deferred sentence to ten (10) years in the Montana State Prison, with eight (8) years suspended, for the offense of Count I: Issuing a Bad Check (Common Scheme), a felony. The Court recommends that the Defendant be screened for the pre-release program as soon as possible and that the Sentence Review Board review the report submitted by Dr. Shea attached to the Pre-Sentence Investigation Report.
On August 5,2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
[73]*73The defendant was not present. However, his case manager, Aaron Hedges, appeared via teleconference and spoke on behalf of the defendant. The defendant was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 5th day of August, 2010.
DATED this 13th day of August, 2010.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
359 Mont. 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-zerbst-mont-2010.