State v. Zeigler
This text of State v. Zeigler (State v. Zeigler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(D)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Bruce Zeigler, Appellant.
Appeal From Lexington County
Marc H. Westbrook, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-179
Submitted March 1, 2005 Filed March 10, 2005
APPEAL DISMISSED
Acting Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Legal Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr., Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, and Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Bruce Zeigler appeals the revocation of his parole, arguing the trial court erred in the revocation because the violations were beyond his control. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Zeiglers appeal under Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR, and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., KITTREDGE and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Zeigler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-zeigler-scctapp-2005.