State v. Zeek
3 A.2d 574, 121 N.J.L. 584, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 280
This text of 3 A.2d 574 (State v. Zeek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Zeek, 3 A.2d 574, 121 N.J.L. 584, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 280 (N.J. 1939).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 11.
For reversal — -None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Varlese
409 A.2d 285 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
State v. Torrance
125 A.2d 403 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 A.2d 574, 121 N.J.L. 584, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-zeek-nj-1939.