State v. Zebroski

CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedJune 21, 2017
Docket9604017809
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Zebroski (State v. Zebroski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Zebroski, (Del. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STATE OF DELAWARE ) V. ID. # 9604017809 CRAIG A. ZEBROSKI, Defendant. ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant Craig A. Zebroski was convicted after trial by jury of murder in the first degree and sentenced to death pursuant to 11 Del. C. § 4209; and

WHEREAS, on August 2, 2016, a majority of the Delaware Supreme Court held in Rauf v. State’ that 11 Del. C. § 4209 was unconstitutional because it deprived a defendant in a capital penalty hearing of his or her Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial; and

WHEREAS, on December 15, 2016, the Delaware Supreme Court held in Powell y. State’ that its decision in Rauf must be applied retroactively and that

Powell’s death sentence therefore must be vacated and a sentence of

' Zebroski also was convicted of other charges for which he received a total sentence of 61 years of unsuspended Level V time. This order does not modify in any way the sentence imposed on those charges.

* 145 A.3d 430 (Del. 2016).

7 — A.3d —, 2016 WL 7243546 (Del. Dec. 15, 2016). “imprisonment for the remainder of his natural life without benefit of probation or parole or any other reduction’ imposed; and

WHEREAS, the parties agree and concede that this Court is required to impose a sentence of imprisonment for the remainder of Zebroski’s natural life without benefit of probation or parole or any other reduction; and

WHEREAS, the parties agree that Zebroski’s pending Motion for Postconviction Relief (the ‘“Motion”) should be stayed pending resolution of Zebroski’s appeal of the sentencing order because that appeal will divest this Court of jurisdiction to rule on the Motion;

NOW, THEREFORE, this 21st day of June, 2017, having conducted a hearing with respect to sentencing, the Court shall issue a sentencing order consistent with this Order, effective August 18, 1997. The Motion is STAYED until the Delaware Supreme Court resolves Zebroski’s appeal of the sentencing

order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. } BS LE grind I C

AbigaibM. beGrow, Judgé/

Original to Prothonotary ce: Elizabeth R. McFarlan, Deputy Attorney General Stamatios Stamoulis, Esquire

* Id. at *5 (citation omitted).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 4209
Delaware § 4209

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Zebroski, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-zebroski-delsuperct-2017.