State v. Zavala

Montana Supreme Court

State v. Zavala

354 Mont. 93

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 12, 2009

DocketCAUSE NO. DC-08-73

StatusPublished

This text of 354 Mont. 93 (State v. Zavala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Zavala, 354 Mont. 93 (Mo. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

On July 17, 2009, the defendant was sentenced as follows: Count T: Twenty (20) years in the Montana State Prison, with ten (10) years suspended, for the offense of Criminal Mischief, a felony; Count II: Six (6) months in the Lake County Jail, with all suspended except 30 days, for the offense of Theft, a misdemeanor; and Count III: Six (6) months in the Lake County Jail, with all suspended except 30 days, for the offense of Possession of Burglary Tools, a misdemeanor Counts I, II and III shall run concurrently with each other. The Defendant was designated a Persistent Felony Offender.

On November 12, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Kara Docherty. The state was not represented.

[94]*94Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 12th day of November, 2009.

DATED this 25th day of November, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Hon. Richard Simonton.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On July 17, 2009, the defendant was sentenced as follows: Count T: Twenty (20) years in the Montana State Prison, with ten (10) years suspended, for the offense of Criminal Mischief, a felony; Count II: Six (6) months in the Lake County Jail, with all suspended except 30 days, for the offense of Theft, a misdemeanor; and Count III: Six (6) months in the Lake County Jail, with all suspended except 30 days, for the offense of Possession of Burglary Tools, a misdemeanor Counts I, II and III shall run concurrently with each other. The Defendant was designated a Persistent Felony Offender.