Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. ZARRAGA

State v. ZARRAGA

16 So. 3d 228, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11415, 2009 WL 2475005
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 14, 2009
Docket5D08-3249
StatusPublished

This text of 16 So. 3d 228 (State v. ZARRAGA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. ZARRAGA, 16 So. 3d 228, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11415, 2009 WL 2475005 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Pease v. State, 712 So.2d 374 (Fla.1997) (downward departure sentence will be affirmed where the trial court orally pronounced valid reasons for departure at the time of sentencing but inadvertently failed to enter contemporaneous written reasons); Valrio v. State, 700 So.2d 668 (Fla.1997); State v. Hall, 981 So.2d 511 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); State v. Fernandez, 927 So.2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); State v. Mann, 866 So.2d 179, 181 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

MONACO, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hall
981 So. 2d 511 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
State v. Mann
866 So. 2d 179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Valrio v. State
700 So. 2d 668 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Pease v. State
712 So. 2d 374 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
State v. Fernandez
927 So. 2d 939 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 So. 3d 228, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11415, 2009 WL 2475005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-zarraga-fladistctapp-2009.