State v. ZARRAGA
16 So. 3d 228, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11415, 2009 WL 2475005
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Pease v. State, 712 So.2d 374 (Fla.1997) (downward departure sentence will be affirmed where the trial court orally pronounced valid reasons for departure at the time of sentencing but inadvertently failed to enter contemporaneous written reasons); Valrio v. State, 700 So.2d 668 (Fla.1997); State v. Hall, 981 So.2d 511 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); State v. Fernandez, 927 So.2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); State v. Mann, 866 So.2d 179, 181 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. ZARRAGA, 16 So. 3d 228, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11415, 2009 WL 2475005 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
16 So. 3d 228 (State v. ZARRAGA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hall
981 So. 2d 511 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
State v. Mann
866 So. 2d 179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Valrio v. State
700 So. 2d 668 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Pease v. State
712 So. 2d 374 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
State v. Fernandez
927 So. 2d 939 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)