State v. Z. W. Y.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Z. W. Y.

461 P.3d 1109, 303 Or. App. 809

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 29, 2020

DocketA170873

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 461 P.3d 1109 (State v. Z. W. Y.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Z. W. Y., 461 P.3d 1109, 303 Or. App. 809 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

Submitted March 24, reversed April 29, 2020

In the Matter of Z. W. Y., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. Z. W. Y., Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 16CC06622; A170873 461 P3d 1109

Manuel Perez, Judge pro tempore. Alexander C. Cambier and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Inge D. Wells, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and DeHoog, Judge, and Mooney, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. 810 State v. Z. W. Y.

PER CURIAM Appellant seeks reversal of an order continuing his commitment to the custody of the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.301; ORS 426.303; ORS 426.307. In his sole assignment of error, appel- lant contends that the record does not contain legally suffi- cient evidence that he continues to be a person with men- tal illness and is in need of further treatment. Specifically, appellant argues that there was insufficient evidence that as a result of a mental disorder he is a danger to others. The state responds that the evidence was sufficient to support the trial court’s determination that appellant was mentally ill and in need of further treatment. After reviewing the record before us, we agree with appellant. The record here contains similar deficiencies to those that we described in State v. Z. W. Y., 299 Or App 703, 450 P3d 544 (2019), a prior case involving the same appellant in which we reversed an order continuing his commitment. We therefore reverse. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Submitted March 24, reversed April 29, 2020

In the Matter of Z. W. Y., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. Z. W. Y., Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 16CC06622; A170873 461 P3d 1109

Manuel Perez, Judge pro tempore. Alexander C. Cambier and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Inge D. Wells, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and DeHoog, Judge, and Mooney, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. 810 State v. Z. W. Y.

PER CURIAM Appellant seeks reversal of an order continuing his commitment to the custody of the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.301; ORS 426.303; ORS 426.307. In his sole assignment of error, appel- lant contends that the record does not contain legally suffi- cient evidence that he continues to be a person with men- tal illness and is in need of further treatment. Specifically, appellant argues that there was insufficient evidence that as a result of a mental disorder he is a danger to others. The state responds that the evidence was sufficient to support the trial court’s determination that appellant was mentally ill and in need of further treatment. After reviewing the record before us, we agree with appellant. The record here contains similar deficiencies to those that we described in State v. Z. W. Y., 299 Or App 703, 450 P3d 544 (2019), a prior case involving the same appellant in which we reversed an order continuing his commitment. We therefore reverse. Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

461 P.3d 1109, 303 Or. App. 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-z-w-y-orctapp-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack