State v. Yungk
This text of 331 N.W.2d 243 (State v. Yungk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of burglary, Minn. Stat. § 609.58 (1982). The trial court sentenced defendant to 45 months in prison, which is the maximum sentence within the presumptive sentence range for the offense in question (severity level IV offense) by a person with defendant’s criminal history score (six). On this appeal from judgment of conviction, defendant seeks an outright reversal of his conviction on the ground that the state failed to prove that a burglary (as opposed to an attempted burglary) was committed or that he committed it. We hold that the evidence of defendant’s guilt was sufficient and we affirm his conviction.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
331 N.W.2d 243, 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-yungk-minn-1983.