State v. Young

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Young

DecidedJanuary 9, 2008

Docket2008-UP-013

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Young (State v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Young, (S.C. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tommy Young, Appellant.

Appeal From Jasper County

Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-013

Submitted January 1, 2008 Filed January 9, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia; Tommy Young, of Ridgeville, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; I. McDuffie Stone, III, of Hampton; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Tommy Young appeals his convictions for armed robbery and possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime, arguing the trial court erred by not granting a mistrial. In his pro se brief, Young also objects to the admission of a witness testimony, argues his due process rights were violated, and alleges his trial counsel was ineffective. After a thorough review of the record, Youngs pro se brief, and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, SHORT and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tommy Young, Appellant.

Appeal From Jasper County

Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-013

Submitted January 1, 2008 Filed January 9, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia; Tommy Young, of Ridgeville, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; I. McDuffie Stone, III, of Hampton; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Tommy Young appeals his convictions for armed robbery and possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime, arguing the trial court erred by not granting a mistrial. In his pro se brief, Young also objects to the admission of a witness testimony, argues his due process rights were violated, and alleges his trial counsel was ineffective. After a thorough review of the record, Youngs pro se brief, and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, SHORT and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Young, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-young-scctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack