State v. Young

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Young

178 S.E.2d 142, 255 S.C. 198, 1970 S.C. LEXIS 185

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedDecember 3, 1970

Docket19133

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 178 S.E.2d 142 (State v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Young, 178 S.E.2d 142, 255 S.C. 198, 1970 S.C. LEXIS 185 (S.C. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appellant Young was indicted for grand larceny and robbery. The jury convicted him of robbery and the appeal is from such conviction and his resulting sentence of five years. He was representel at the trial by retained counsel of many years experience. Counsel on appeal was appointed for such purpose.

The record does not reflect that any of the questions argued on appeal were raised or passed upon in the course of the trial below. It is elementary that questions not raised in the trial may not be raised for the first time on appeal. See West’s South Carolina Digest, Appeal and Error, Key No. 167. There being no questions properly before us for consideration, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appellant Young was indicted for grand larceny and robbery. The jury convicted him of robbery and the appeal is from such conviction and his resulting sentence of five years. He was representel at the trial by retained counsel of many years experience. Counsel on appeal was appointed for such purpose.

The record does not reflect that any of the questions argued on appeal were raised or passed upon in the course of the trial below. It is elementary that questions not raised in the trial may not be raised for the first time on appeal. See West’s South Carolina Digest, Appeal and Error, Key No. 167. There being no questions properly before us for consideration, the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 S.E.2d 142, 255 S.C. 198, 1970 S.C. LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-young-sc-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack