State v. Young

513 S.W.3d 387, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 175, 2017 WL 977257
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 14, 2017·No. No. ED 103420·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Orlando Young (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment following a jury trial convicting him of three counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, in violation of Section 566.062 (RSMo. 2000), and three counts of first-degree child molestation, in violation of Section 566.067 (RSMo. 2000).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Young, 513 S.W.3d 387, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 175, 2017 WL 977257 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

513 S.W.3d 387 (State v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. Lewis
E.D. Missouri, 2023