State v. Young
This text of 513 S.W.3d 387 (State v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Orlando Young (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment following a jury trial convicting him of three counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, in violation of Section 566.062 (RSMo. 2000), and three counts of first-degree child molestation, in violation of Section 566.067 (RSMo. 2000).
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
513 S.W.3d 387, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 175, 2017 WL 977257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-young-moctapp-2017.