State v. Young
This text of State v. Young (State v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Circuit Court for Howard County Case No. 13-K-92-026377
IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF MARYLAND
Petition No. 127
September Term, 2025
STATE OF MARYLAND
v.
ALTON ROMERO YOUNG
Fader, C.J., Watts, Booth, Biran, Gould, Eaves, Killough, JJ.
PER CURIAM ORDER
Filed: July 25, 2025 Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2025.07.25 '00'04- 12:14:20 Gregory Hilton, Clerk * IN THE * SUPREME COURT STATE OF MARYLAND * OF MARYLAND * v. Petition No. 127 * September Term, 2025
ALTON ROMERO YOUNG * (No. 835, Sept. Term, 2023 Appellate Court of Maryland) * (Cir. Ct. No. 13-K-92-026377) *
ORDER
In 1993, the respondent, Alton Romero Young, was convicted by a jury in the
Circuit Court for Howard County for first-degree felony murder, first-degree rape, and
unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, offenses committed when he was 16 years old. Mr.
Young was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole for first-degree murder and
four years for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle to run concurrently with his sentence
for first-degree murder. The Appellate Court of Maryland affirmed the judgment of
conviction in Alton Romero Young v. State, No. 900, Sept. Term, 1993.
On March 2, 2022, Mr. Young filed his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant
to the Juvenile Restoration Act, Md. Code Ann., Crim. Proc. (“CP”) § 8-110 (2018 Repl.
Vol., 2024 Supp.). The circuit court denied the motion and Mr. Young appealed.
On appeal, the Appellate Court denied the State’s motion to dismiss the appeal,
vacated the judgment of the circuit court and remanded the case to the circuit court for further proceedings. The State then filed its petition for writ of certiorari in this Court.
Subsequent to the Appellate Court’s opinion, this Court issued its opinion in James
Russell Trimble v. State of Maryland, No. 28, Sept. Term, 2024.
Upon consideration of the petition and the respondent’s answer to the petition and
in light of Trimble, it is this 25th day of July 2025, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,
ORDERED that the petition is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that the judgment of the Appellate Court of Maryland is vacated; and it
is further
ORDERED that this case is remanded to the Appellate Court for further
consideration in light of this Court’s opinion in Trimble.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Young, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-young-md-2025.