State v. Young

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJuly 25, 2025
Docket127pet/25
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Young (State v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Young, (Md. 2025).

Opinion

Circuit Court for Howard County Case No. 13-K-92-026377

IN THE SUPREME COURT

OF MARYLAND

Petition No. 127

September Term, 2025

STATE OF MARYLAND

v.

ALTON ROMERO YOUNG

Fader, C.J., Watts, Booth, Biran, Gould, Eaves, Killough, JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Filed: July 25, 2025 Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2025.07.25 '00'04- 12:14:20 Gregory Hilton, Clerk * IN THE * SUPREME COURT STATE OF MARYLAND * OF MARYLAND * v. Petition No. 127 * September Term, 2025

ALTON ROMERO YOUNG * (No. 835, Sept. Term, 2023 Appellate Court of Maryland) * (Cir. Ct. No. 13-K-92-026377) *

ORDER

In 1993, the respondent, Alton Romero Young, was convicted by a jury in the

Circuit Court for Howard County for first-degree felony murder, first-degree rape, and

unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, offenses committed when he was 16 years old. Mr.

Young was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole for first-degree murder and

four years for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle to run concurrently with his sentence

for first-degree murder. The Appellate Court of Maryland affirmed the judgment of

conviction in Alton Romero Young v. State, No. 900, Sept. Term, 1993.

On March 2, 2022, Mr. Young filed his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant

to the Juvenile Restoration Act, Md. Code Ann., Crim. Proc. (“CP”) § 8-110 (2018 Repl.

Vol., 2024 Supp.). The circuit court denied the motion and Mr. Young appealed.

On appeal, the Appellate Court denied the State’s motion to dismiss the appeal,

vacated the judgment of the circuit court and remanded the case to the circuit court for further proceedings. The State then filed its petition for writ of certiorari in this Court.

Subsequent to the Appellate Court’s opinion, this Court issued its opinion in James

Russell Trimble v. State of Maryland, No. 28, Sept. Term, 2024.

Upon consideration of the petition and the respondent’s answer to the petition and

in light of Trimble, it is this 25th day of July 2025, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that the petition is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the judgment of the Appellate Court of Maryland is vacated; and it

is further

ORDERED that this case is remanded to the Appellate Court for further

consideration in light of this Court’s opinion in Trimble.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Young, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-young-md-2025.