State v. Young

492 So. 2d 188, 1986 La. App. LEXIS 7260
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Young. Read the opinion of the Court — 469 So. 2d 1014
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 26, 1986·No. No. KA-5512·Published

Opinion

KLEES, Judge.

On December 20, 1985, the appellant was charged with distributing a substance falsely represented to be cocaine. He was arraigned on January 7, 1986, and pled not guilty. On February 13th a six-member jury found him guilty of attempted distribution of a substance falsely represented to be cocaine. His motion for post judgment verdict of acquittal was denied on February 20th. He waived all delays and was sentenced as a multiple offender to serve two years at hard labor. His motion for appeal was filed on February 28th.

By his sole assignment of error, the appellant requests a review of the record for errors patent. We have reviewed the record and our review reveals there are no errors patent.

Accordingly, appellant’s conviction and sentence are hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Young, 492 So. 2d 188, 1986 La. App. LEXIS 7260 (La. Ct. App. 1986).

492 So. 2d 188 (State v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.