State v. Young

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State v. Young

324 So. 2d 869, 1975 La. App. LEXIS 4384

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 24, 1975

DocketNo. 5284

StatusPublished

This text of 324 So. 2d 869 (State v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Young, 324 So. 2d 869, 1975 La. App. LEXIS 4384 (La. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinions

CUTRER, Judge.

Plaintiff, State of Louisiana, appeals from the dismissal of its action filed under the Motor Vehicle Habitual Offender Law, LSA-R.S. 32:1471 et seq., which action was filed to rule into court the defendant, Donald J. Young, to show cause why he should not be adjudged an habitual offender and, accordingly, barred from operating a motor vehicle on the highways of this [870]*870State. This suit was consolidated with State of Louisiana v. Ivory Rone, 324 So.2d 867 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1975) for hearing at the trial level and on appeal.

For the reasons assigned in State of Louisiana v. Ivory Rone, supra, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion in State of Louisiana v. Ivory Rone, supra, and LSA-R.S. 32:1471 et seq. Costs of this appeal are assessed against defendant-appellee.

Reversed and remanded.

WATSON, J., concurred for reasons assigned in State v. Rone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CUTRER, Judge.

Plaintiff, State of Louisiana, appeals from the dismissal of its action filed under the Motor Vehicle Habitual Offender Law, LSA-R.S. 32:1471 et seq., which action was filed to rule into court the defendant, Donald J. Young, to show cause why he should not be adjudged an habitual offender and, accordingly, barred from operating a motor vehicle on the highways of this [870]*870State. This suit was consolidated with State of Louisiana v. Ivory Rone, 324 So.2d 867 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1975) for hearing at the trial level and on appeal.

For the reasons assigned in State of Louisiana v. Ivory Rone, supra, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion in State of Louisiana v. Ivory Rone, supra, and LSA-R.S. 32:1471 et seq. Costs of this appeal are assessed against defendant-appellee.

Reversed and remanded.

WATSON, J., concurred for reasons assigned in State v. Rone.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

324 So. 2d 869, 1975 La. App. LEXIS 4384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-young-lactapp-1975.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack