State v. Young

351 So. 2d 1215, 1977 La. LEXIS 6502
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Young. Read the opinion of the Court — 337 So. 2d 1196
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 14, 1977·No. No. 60702·Published

Opinion

In re: State of Louisiana through Harry F. Conniek, District Attorney applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered- that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Andrew Búcaro, Judge Ad Hoc of the Criminal District, Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 28th day of November, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Young, 351 So. 2d 1215, 1977 La. LEXIS 6502 (La. 1977).

351 So. 2d 1215 (State v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.