State v. Younce

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Younce

563 S.W.3d 854

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 18, 2018

DocketWD 80285

StatusPublished

This text of 563 S.W.3d 854 (State v. Younce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Younce, 563 S.W.3d 854 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David Younce appeals his convictions of the class A misdemeanor third-degree domestic assault, the class D felony unlawful use of a weapon, and two counts of the class A misdemeanor second-degree endangering the welfare of a child. In his sole point on appeal, he contends that the trial court abused its discretion in sustaining the State's objection to a witness's testimony regarding prior inconsistent statements of another witness. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

David Younce appeals his convictions of the class A misdemeanor third-degree domestic assault, the class D felony unlawful use of a weapon, and two counts of the class A misdemeanor second-degree endangering the welfare of a child. In his sole point on appeal, he contends that the trial court abused its discretion in sustaining the State's objection to a witness's testimony regarding prior inconsistent statements of another witness. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

563 S.W.3d 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-younce-moctapp-2018.