Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Yost

State v. Yost

554 P.2d 545, 27 Or. App. 51, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1301
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 4, 1976
DocketNo. C 75-03-0655 Cr, CA 6556
StatusPublished

This text of 554 P.2d 545 (State v. Yost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Yost, 554 P.2d 545, 27 Or. App. 51, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1301 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The state confesses error. Defendant was originally sentenced to five years for burglary, with execution of sentence suspended. His probation was later revoked after commission and conviction of a subsequent crime. The trial court thereupon ordered that the original sentence be served consecutive to the subsequent sentence. Such an order was not permissible under the facts of this case. State v. Stevens, 253 Or 563, 456 P2d 494 (1969); State v. Manrique, 24 Or App 309, 545 P2d 603 (1976).

Remanded for entry of an appropriate order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Stevens
456 P.2d 494 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1969)
State v. Manrique
545 P.2d 603 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
554 P.2d 545, 27 Or. App. 51, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-yost-orctapp-1976.