State v. Yole

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Yole

369 S.W.3d 805, 2012 WL 3026268, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 926

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 26, 2012·No. Nos. WD 74140, WD 74748·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Yole appeals the denial of his Rule 29.12 motion, which alleged the trial court plainly erred in sentencing him to consecutive prison sentences on his convictions for second-degree murder and armed criminal action. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Yole appeals the denial of his Rule 29.12 motion, which alleged the trial court plainly erred in sentencing him to consecutive prison sentences on his convictions for second-degree murder and armed criminal action. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

State v. Yole, 369 S.W.3d 805, 2012 WL 3026268, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 926 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

369 S.W.3d 805 (State v. Yole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.