State v. Yeni
This text of State v. Yeni (State v. Yeni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
The State, Respondent,
v.
David Brian Yeni, Appellant.
Appeal from Richland County
James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2007-MO-047
Heard May 23, 2007 Filed July 2, 2007
AFFIRMED
Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney Salley W. Elliott, and Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman Mark Rapoport; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Mallory, 270 S.C. 519, 242 S.E.2d 693 (1978) (no error to refuse charge on simple assault and battery under an indictment for ABHAN unless there is testimony tending to show defendant is guilty only of simple assault and battery).
TOAL, C.J., MOORE, BURNETT, PLEICONES, JJ., and Acting Justice Michael G. Nettles, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Yeni, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-yeni-sc-2007.