State v. Yarger

321 Or. App. 541
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 31, 2022
DocketA175137
StatusUnpublished

This text of 321 Or. App. 541 (State v. Yarger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Yarger, 321 Or. App. 541 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1). Submitted July 29, affirmed August 31, 2022

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JUSTIN MICHAEL YARGER, Defendant-Appellant. Clackamas County Circuit Court 20CR05325; A175137

Susie L. Norby, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Kali Montague, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Robert M. Wilsey, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before James, Presiding Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge, and Joyce, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Ramos, 318 Or App 224, 505 P3d 106 (2022).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ramos
505 P.3d 1106 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
321 Or. App. 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-yarger-orctapp-2022.