State v. Yanetti
This text of 127 A. 927 (State v. Yanetti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant in this case was indicted and convicted for having on the 1st day of June, 1922, committed upon Anna Sigismondi, a woman child under the age of 16 years, a carnal abuse. The indictment charged the offense as having been committed on the 1st'day of June, 1922. The complaining witness fixed the time, by saying that.it was in' the month of June, because it was "summertime.” This is the reason urged why the conviction should be set aside, citing State v. Sing Lee, 110 Atl. Rep. 113. We think the point is answered and the case controlled by what we said in the case of State v. Calabrese, 2 N. J. Adv. R. 588.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 A. 927, 2 N.J. Misc. 424, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-yanetti-nj-1924.