State v. Y. L.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Y. L.

157 P.3d 311, 212 Or. App. 214, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 532

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 18, 2007

Docket051273539; A131292

StatusPublished

This text of 157 P.3d 311 (State v. Y. L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Y. L., 157 P.3d 311, 212 Or. App. 214, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 532 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to provide for her basic needs because of her mental disorder. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to provide for her basic needs because of her mental disorder. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 P.3d 311, 212 Or. App. 214, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-y-l-orctapp-2007.