State v. Wytcherley

299 P.3d 606, 256 Or. App. 128, 2013 WL 1352355, 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 368
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 3, 2013
Docket10CR0659; A149051
StatusPublished

This text of 299 P.3d 606 (State v. Wytcherley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Wytcherley, 299 P.3d 606, 256 Or. App. 128, 2013 WL 1352355, 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 368 (Or. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

A jury found defendant guilty of one count of second-degree assault and one count of unlawful use of a weapon.1 Both counts were based on a single incident in which defendant shot his brother in the leg. The trial court entered two separate convictions, and defendant appeals.

In a single assignment of error, defendant argues that the trial court plainly erred in entering two separate convictions rather than merging the guilty verdicts into a single conviction for second-degree assault. The state, for its part, concedes that the trial court plainly erred in that regard. See State v. Ryder, 230 Or App 432, 216 P3d 895 (2009). We accept the state’s concession and, for the reasons expressed in Ryder, 230 Or App at 435, exercise our discretion to correct the error.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to merge conviction for unlawful use of a weapon (Count 3) into conviction for assault in the second degree (Count 2) and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ryder
216 P.3d 895 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 P.3d 606, 256 Or. App. 128, 2013 WL 1352355, 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wytcherley-orctapp-2013.