State v. Wysinger

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wysinger

541 S.W.3d 614

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 12, 2017

DocketNo. ED 105035

StatusPublished

This text of 541 S.W.3d 614 (State v. Wysinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wysinger, 541 S.W.3d 614 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Charles Wysinger appeals from judgment upon his conviction after a bench trial on one count of first-degree endangering the welfare of a child in violation of Section 568.045 RSMo. 2000¹ and one *615count of abuse or neglect of a child in violation of Section 568.060. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Charles Wysinger appeals from judgment upon his conviction after a bench trial on one count of first-degree endangering the welfare of a child in violation of Section 568.045 RSMo. 2000¹ and one *615count of abuse or neglect of a child in violation of Section 568.060. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

541 S.W.3d 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wysinger-moctapp-2017.