State v. Wynne

101 So. 273, 156 La. 938, 1924 La. LEXIS 2127
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 28, 1924·No. No. 26530·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the WHOLE COURT.

O’NIELL, C. J.

This case was remanded to the district court for a trial and determination of the question whether certain alleged newly discovered evidence, referred to in a motion for a new trial, was in fact newly discovered. 153 La. 414, 96 South. 15. After hearing testimony on the subject, the district court ruled that the alleged newly discovered evidence was not newly discovered. The court, therefore, overruled the motion for a new trial and resentenced the defendants. The record does not contain a bill of exceptions to the ruling, and there is no apparent error.

The verdict and sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wynne, 101 So. 273, 156 La. 938, 1924 La. LEXIS 2127 (La. 1924).

101 So. 273 (State v. Wynne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Boykin
234 P. 157 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1925)