State v. Wynne
This text of 101 So. 273 (State v. Wynne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the WHOLE COURT.
This case was remanded to the district court for a trial and determination of the question whether certain alleged newly discovered evidence, referred to in a motion for a new trial, was in fact newly discovered. 153 La. 414, 96 South. 15. After hearing testimony on the subject, the district court ruled that the alleged newly discovered evidence was not newly discovered. The court, therefore, overruled the motion for a new trial and resentenced the defendants. The record does not contain a bill of exceptions to the ruling, and there is no apparent error.
The verdict and sentence are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 So. 273, 156 La. 938, 1924 La. LEXIS 2127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wynne-la-1924.