State v. Wymer
This text of 491 P.3d 99 (State v. Wymer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Argued and submitted December 18, 2020; convictions on Counts 1 and 2 reversed and remanded, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed July 21; petition for review denied November 24, 2021 (368 Or 788)
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TODD ALLAN WYMER, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 18CR78463; A171738 491 P3d 99
Ricardo J. Menchaca, Judge. Adam L. Dean argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant. Peenesh Shah, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General. Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge. PER CURIAM Convictions on Counts 1 and 2 reversed and remanded; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed. Cite as 313 Or App 490 (2021) 491
PER CURIAM Defendant was convicted of five criminal counts. Defendant requested a unanimous verdict instruction, but the trial court gave a nonunanimous verdict instruction. On Counts 1 and 2, the jury verdicts were nonunanimous. We reverse and remand those counts. Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020). On Counts 3, 4, and 5, the jury verdicts were unanimous. We affirm those counts. State v. Ciraulo, 367 Or 350, 478 P3d 502 (2020), cert den, ___ US ___, 141 S Ct 2836, 210 L Ed 2d 950 (2021). We reject without written discussion defendant’s remaining assignments of error. Convictions on Counts 1 and 2 reversed and remanded; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
491 P.3d 99, 313 Or. App. 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wymer-orctapp-2021.